Post Detail

What’s Better for Low-Skilled Workers: Higher Minimum Wages or Lower Taxes?

By Kathryn Hickok

What’s better for welfare recipients and low-skilled workers: a higher minimum wage, or a larger Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)? David Neumark, director of the Economic Self-Sufficiency Policy Research Institute at the University of California, Irvine, explains in a recent op-ed in the Wall Street Journal why the EITC benefits low-income single parents more over time than does a higher minimum wage.

The Earned Income Tax Credit is a tax benefit for low-to-moderate-income wage earners who have dependent children. By reducing the amount of taxes owed, the EITC lessens the impact of taxation on earned income when people enter the workforce, and therefore can provide a strong incentive to transition off public assistance.

“The minimum wage does, of course, provide an immediate boost to earnings of employed workers,” Neumark writes. “But evidence indicates that minimum wages reduce employment among young workers, costing them work experience that generates earnings growth in the long run. One of my recent studies shows that the shift to higher minimum wages since 2000 has contributed significantly to declines in employment among teens in school, which can reduce adult earnings later.”

“Because it promotes work,” he adds, “the EITC should do the opposite among those eligible for its most generous benefits—low-skilled single mothers….The evidence shows that exposure to a more generous EITC leads to markedly higher earnings in the long run among less-educated single mothers.”

Neumark recommends that if lawmakers want to pursue policies “that help turn government assistance…into economic self-sufficiency,” they should incentivize work. Rather than make it harder to enter the workforce, lawmakers should make it easier for working parents to keep more of the money they earn. They’ll not only take home more of their paychecks, but they’ll also increase the skills and experience that will raise their wages. That combination is a winning path out of poverty and government dependence for working parents and their children.

Kathryn Hickok is Executive Vice President at Cascade Policy Institute, Oregon’s free market public policy research organization.

Click here for the PDF version:

4-18-18-What’s_Better_for_Low-Skilled_Workers

2 Comments

  • Larry Sparks

    The recommendation of this study is not new, business owners and conservative economist have been saying this for years. When work is incentivized for youth and
    young adults, a good work ethic is learned along with desire to remain employed. When opportunities arise as different skill sets are learned, everybody goes after better paying jobs not welfare. When will the State and Federal legislature learn this simple economic and motivational lesson?

    • 2:21 am - April 21, 2018

  • Walter Woodland

    Why is there no link to; “The evidence [which] shows that exposure to a more generous EITC leads to markedly higher earnings in the long run among less-educated single mothers.”

    Also missing from the analysis is whether or not the EITC (which is more often a debit) encourages it’s beneficiaries to improve their situation enough to maximize the EITC benefit, but to eschew further improvements such as marriage to a suitable co-provider and biological or step parent to their children.

    A question I’ve long had. Does the EITC show up in the federal register as a spending item, or is it reported as a reduction in revenue?

    • 2:15 pm - April 22, 2018

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *