» Testimony in opposition to HJR 100 regarding health care as a fundamental right

February 5, 2010

Testimony in opposition to HJR 100 regarding health care as a fundamental right

Filed under: — Steve Buckstein

Steve BucksteinCascade Commentary

Testimony before the House Committee on Health Care

February 4, 2010

Chair Greenlick and members of the Committee, my name is Steve Buckstein. I’m Senior Policy Analyst and founder of Cascade Policy Institute, a Portland-based research center that promotes individual liberty, personal responsibility and economic opportunity in Oregon. 

On a philosophical level, I object to defining health care as a right, or more precisely, what philosophers call a “positive” right. This country was founded on the belief that government cannot create rights; it can at best protect our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. These so-called “negative” rights don’t put demands on anyone else; except the demand that no one violate them.

On a practical level, creating a positive right to health care would create an obligation on the part of some people to pay for it, and an obligation on the part of other people to provide the actual health care services. These obligations actually violate the rights of these individuals. 

On a political level, I understand that government tries to grant such rights all the time. In this case, passing this constitutional amendment will make some people feel good. It says that we care deeply about the uninsured, but it only gives intellectual lip service, if that, to the matter of future costs.

Define health care as a fundamental right and cost control will go out the window – witness the public school system and how the Quality Education Model
demands spending increases that likely won’t result in any quality improvement.

I can almost see the just-around-the-corner Quality Health Care Model defining prototype health clinics, with mandated staffing levels, required tests, etc. Innovation will become mired in bureaucratic process.

Rather than spend precious political capital trying to create an artificial right to health care, I suggest we spend that capital finding practical ways to drive health care costs down and quality up.  Make it easier for more people to afford health care on their own by getting un-needed mandates and insurance regulation out of the way. Make insurance premiums for everyone tax deductible, not just for employers. Then, if you decide that some people still can’t afford it, take a page from the food stamp book, or other such programs where you simply subsidize health care purchases for low-income people. That will distort the economics far less than the route you’re trying to embark on here today.

### 

Hearing audio is here.  Buckstein testimony begins at 01:39:05.

1 Comment»

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://www.cascadepolicy.org/2010/02/05/testimony-in-opposition-to-hjr-100-regarding-health-care-as-a-fundamental-right/trackback/

  1. [...] Cascade Policy Institute – Oregon Public Policy » Testimony in opposition to HJR 100 reg… [...]

    Pingback by My Experience of Not Having Health Insurance for Many Years | Student Dental Insurance — 2/5/2010 @

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


 

 








Cascade in the Captiol
ORED Tax Credit

Measure 66-67
Climate Chains
Childrens Scholarship Fund - Portland
Oregon School Choice Video Contest
Speak Out Oregon!




OREGON CATALYST BLOG


CASCADE AUTHORS


Cascade Policy Institute
4850 SW Scholls Ferry Road
Suite #103
Portland, Oregon 97225

phone: 503.242.0900
fax: 503.242.3822
info@cascadepolicy.org

 

© 2009 Cascade Policy Institute